QT time prolongation
Adverse drug events
Variants ✨For the computationally intensive evaluation of the variants, please choose the paid standard subscription.
Explanations of the substances for patients
We have no additional warnings for the combination of abarelix and hydrochlorothiazide. Please also consult the relevant specialist information.
The reported changes in exposure correspond to the changes in the plasma concentration-time curve [ AUC ]. We do not expect any change in exposure for abarelix, when combined with hydrochlorothiazide (100%). We do not expect any change in exposure for hydrochlorothiazide, when combined with abarelix (100%).
The pharmacokinetic parameters of the average population are used as the starting point for calculating the individual changes in exposure due to the interactions.
The bioavailability of abarelix is unknown. The terminal half-life [ t12 ] is rather long at 316.8 hours and constant plasma levels [ Css ] are only reached after more than 1267.2 hours. The protein binding [ Pb ] is 97.5% strong. The metabolism via cytochromes is currently still being worked on.
Hydrochlorothiazide has a mean oral bioavailability [ F ] of 70%, which is why the maximum plasma levels [Cmax] tend to change with an interaction. The terminal half-life [ t12 ] is 10.2 hours and constant plasma levels [ Css ] are reached after approximately 40.8 hours. Protein binding [ Pb ] is not known. About 95.0% of an administered dose is excreted unchanged via the kidneys and this proportion is seldom changed by interactions. The metabolism does not take place via the common cytochromes and the active transport takes place partly via BCRP, MRP4 and PGP.
|Serotonergic Effects a||0||Ø||Ø|
Rating: According to our knowledge, neither abarelix nor hydrochlorothiazide increase serotonergic activity.
|Kiesel & Durán b||0||Ø||Ø|
Rating: According to our knowledge, neither abarelix nor hydrochlorothiazide increase anticholinergic activity.
QT time prolongation
Rating: In combination, abarelix and hydrochlorothiazide can potentially trigger ventricular arrhythmias of the torsades de pointes type.
General adverse effects
|Side effects||∑ frequency||aba||hyd|
|Basal cell carcinoma of skin||0.0 %||n.a.||0.0|
|Squamous cell carcinoma||0.0 %||n.a.||0.0|
|Stevens johnson syndrome||0.0 %||n.a.||0.0|
|Toxic epidermal necrolysis||0.0 %||n.a.||0.0|
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: hydrochlorothiazide
Renal failure: hydrochlorothiazide
Based on your answers and scientific information, we assess the individual risk of undesirable side effects. These recommendations are intended to advise professionals and are not a substitute for consultation with a doctor. In the restricted test version (alpha), the risk of all substances has not yet been conclusively assessed.
Abstract: 14C-hydrochlorothiazide (hct) was administered orally (n=4) and iv (n = 2 to healthy subjects. The gastrointestinal absorption ranged between 60% and 80%, most of it took place in the duodenum and the upper jejunum. The radioactivity was eliminated mainly in the urine, while no sigificant biliary excretion was observed. Chromatographic analysis of the urinary radioactivity demonstrated that greater than 95% of the absorbed or injected 14C-hct was excreted unchanged. The radioactivity in plasma during the first 10 hr after oral administration declined with a fast phase but the levels of label thereafter suggested a slow phase. The existence of such a phase was verified in 1 subject given 75 mg hct orally. His plasma levels of hct (determined with gas-liquid chromatography) declined according to a 2-compartment model, the half-lives of the alpha-and beta-phases being 1.7 and 13.1 hr, respectively. Hct accumulated in the blood cells and the ratio between the radioactivity in cells and that in plasma averaged 3.5. The fate of a single dose of 14C-hct in 2 hypertensive patients treated with the drug chronically was similar to that in the healthy subjects. A third patient, who had slightly elevated serum creatinine, eliminated hct more slowly than the others. Like the healthy subjects, the patients eliminated hct to greater than 95% in unchanged form.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Anticholinergic drugs are often involved in explicit criteria for inappropriate prescribing in older adults. Several scales were developed for screening of anticholinergic drugs and estimation of the anticholinergic burden. However, variation exists in scale development, in the selection of anticholinergic drugs, and the evaluation of their anticholinergic load. This study aims to systematically review existing anticholinergic risk scales, and to develop a uniform list of anticholinergic drugs differentiating for anticholinergic potency. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE. Studies were included if provided (1) a finite list of anticholinergic drugs; (2) a grading score of anticholinergic potency and, (3) a validation in a clinical or experimental setting. We listed anticholinergic drugs for which there was agreement in the different scales. In case of discrepancies between scores we used a reputed reference source (Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference®) to take a final decision about the anticholinergic activity of the drug. RESULTS: We included seven risk scales, and evaluated 225 different drugs. Hundred drugs were listed as having clinically relevant anticholinergic properties (47 high potency and 53 low potency), to be included in screening software for anticholinergic burden. CONCLUSION: Considerable variation exists among anticholinergic risk scales, in terms of selection of specific drugs, as well as of grading of anticholinergic potency. Our selection of 100 drugs with clinically relevant anticholinergic properties needs to be supplemented with validated information on dosing and route of administration for a full estimation of the anticholinergic burden in poly-medicated older adults.
Abstract: Transporters in proximal renal tubules contribute to the disposition of numerous drugs. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms of tubular secretion have been progressively elucidated during the past decades. Organic anions tend to be secreted by the transport proteins OAT1, OAT3 and OATP4C1 on the basolateral side of tubular cells, and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2, MRP4, OATP1A2 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) on the apical side. Organic cations are secreted by organic cation transporter (OCT) 2 on the basolateral side, and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins MATE1, MATE2/2-K, P-glycoprotein, organic cation and carnitine transporter (OCTN) 1 and OCTN2 on the apical side. Significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may affect any of these transporters, altering the clearance and, consequently, the efficacy and/or toxicity of substrate drugs. Interactions at the level of basolateral transporters typically decrease the clearance of the victim drug, causing higher systemic exposure. Interactions at the apical level can also lower drug clearance, but may be associated with higher renal toxicity, due to intracellular accumulation. Whereas the importance of glomerular filtration in drug disposition is largely appreciated among clinicians, DDIs involving renal transporters are less well recognized. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles, quantitative importance and clinical relevance of these transporters in drug therapy. It proposes an approach based on substrate-inhibitor associations for predicting potential tubular-based DDIs and preventing their adverse consequences. We provide a comprehensive list of known drug interactions with renally-expressed transporters. While many of these interactions have limited clinical consequences, some involving high-risk drugs (e.g. methotrexate) definitely deserve the attention of prescribers.